No sides. Just data.

We compare what the media report with what the data say

Home › Today's contrasts › Crime and courts

Crime and courts · 4 outlets

Yet to test legality of logical discrepancy in SIR: Supreme Court

Origin The Indian Express · 27/10 08:33 → 4 outlets in 46 h

What most outlets report and this one does not

1/4 outlets

Left out, among others, Election Commission

See what each outlet leaves out

How each outlet tells it

What most outlets report and this one does not

  • The Times of India does not mention Election Commission

Only outlets whose full text we read are assessed.

Where they agree

People, places and institutions named by most of the 4 outlets (how many name each):

Bihar 4/4Delhi 4/4Supreme Court 4/4West Bengal 4/4Election Commission 3/4

Who does not report it

1 outlets

National outlets from the same country that published those days and have no piece in this story. Not an accusation: it may be an editorial choice.

NDTV

Who reports it and how

5 stories
  1. The Indian Express 27/10 08:33 · National Form 6, voter roll deletions: What Election Commission told the Supreme Court
  2. The Indian Express 28/10 15:56 · National Still to decide legality of logical discrepancy: Supreme Court hears plea over voter deletions
  3. The Times of India 28/10 22:46 · National Yet to test legality of logical discrepancy in SIR: Supreme Court
  4. Scroll.in 29/10 05:35 · National ‘Logical discrepancy’ permitted in Bengal SIR as interim measure, legality yet to be decided: SC
  5. The Hindu 29/10 06:20 · National Restore previous elected govt in West Bengal, says TMC’s Abhishek Banerjee after SC’s SIR observations

More contrasts in crime and courts

27/10/2026 08:33 – 29/10/2026 06:20 UTC · Analysis basis: texto completo · Methodology · Automatically produced, reviewable content. Headlines and short excerpts quoted with a link to the original outlet. The analysis is our own.